There are Only Two Types of People Post-SHTF: Assets and Liabilities. Which Are You?

helping-handsPeople can be classified in all sorts of ways if you like: tall or short, pretty or ugly, predator or victim. In a post-SHTF world I like to look at people as either assets or liabilities. This means EVERYBODY, including people you expect to be in your survival group, people that show up on your doorstep TEOTWAWKI + 1, your significant other, your children, and even YOU. Yup, you too.

Dependents

I do firstly want to point out that it’s not always bad to be classified as a liability. For example, I wouldn’t necessary consider my children as part of the “assets” group because, let’s face it, they’re still young and I don’t expect a whole lot from them. I want them to be kids while they can be.

That’s not to say they won’t get put to work or have much greater expectations placed upon them in a SHTF situation. They certainly will. In that case they will likely turn into assets because they are healthy, smart, and capable.

Right now, however, they’re more likely liabilities that I willfully accept for obvious reasons since they’re my kids and as time continues on I (and my wife) will teach them life-skills that should turn them into assets as they grow into adulthood… well, that’s the plan anyway!

Survival Group Members

What about people you’ve selected to be in your survival group? Perhaps you’ve selected them for their specific skill-sets, such as being a doctor, nurse, mechanic, LEO, or whatever. Sure, these people should be considered assets but what about other aspects of their life? For example, a doctor isn’t a doctor all of the time. Do they get a free ride in every other aspect of life? Hopefully not.

For example, if the doctor in your group suffers from their own difficulties, say they have a hard time walking around or just bending over, would they not be expected to tend the garden or to pull guard duty? If they can’t perform these tasks what can they do? These are things to consider before they become a festering problem.

What about their “baggage?” Specifically those people they expect to bring with them, including immediate family, but maybe even unexpected people like their close friends? Would these people be considered assets or liabilities? Would they be welcome and what happens if/when they don’t or won’t pull their own weight?

Showing up at Your Doorstep

Similarly, I’m sure that if you’ve prepped for any length of time then you probably have an entourage of sorts, those people who say unequivocally that they’re “coming to your house” when times get tough. Maybe that’s good for you, maybe not.

Who are these people?

I’m sure they’re not as prepared as you–if at all–but maybe that’s not all bad especially if these people have very useful skills. Maybe you’ll overlook the fact that they willfully choose not to prepare because they bring something to the table you need, such as any of the aforementioned skills, or, maybe they don’t and you just love them to pieces. 😉

Is this the type of decision you make on the spot or have you thought about it beforehand? I know some people think this is an easy call to “just say no” but I’d venture it’s not nearly that easy for a variety of reasons.

YOU

How in the world can YOU be anything but an asset, you ask? Well, if there’s anybody who should be considered an asset in a post-SHTF world it should be YOU because, after all, you had the foresight and wherewithal to stockpile an assortment of supplies, gear, and especially knowledge to see you through.

I’d suggest you should simply get “grandfathered in” but perhaps not so fast. 🙁

What happens when those supplies run out? Maybe your plans fell through and your group had to improvise and you just don’t want to, or perhaps you’re one of those people who can’t pull their own weight due to chronic health conditions or even an illness? Here’s a situation where you started out as an asset but wound up a liability, at least, in the group’s eyes. Do you get a pass or not?

Hell yes you do!

Does Any of This Even Matter?

You might think, “why does any of this matter?” So what if the doctor can’t tend the garden or pull guard duty because he has a bad hip. So what if you develop arthritis and just can’t wash the laundry or do the dishes any more… that’s going to be my excuse, get your own!

I’d say it’s potentially a big deal because in a society where life no longer comes easily everyone will be measured and scrutinized. Eventually, people will be seen as either “pulling their own weight” or not. It may be overlooked for some time but group dynamics can be a funny thing. And, sadly, people have a short memory. What you did for others yesterday may not mean quite enough today.

Ultimately, I would like to think there will be some humanity left. After all, who in their right mind would kick out an elderly grandmother because she can’t do the laundry any more? I should hope nobody. But that doesn’t mean most of us won’t be looked at in a different light, scrutinized, and be quick to evict those who just aren’t as useful any longer.

It’s something to think about.


Posted

in

by

My latest book, The Survival Blueprint: How to Prepare Your Family for Disaster, can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CJ49Y5X4

Comments

5 responses to “There are Only Two Types of People Post-SHTF: Assets and Liabilities. Which Are You?”

  1. While I hate to quote the commies, “Each according to his ability, each according to his need.” In a post disaster situation, we will most likely be living in some type of communal setting. There are many aspects of the daily tasks and ways for even the most feeble to make SOME contribution.
    We already teach our children (even at the earliest age) to do their part by having them put their toys away before bed or by enjoying their help with laundry, setting the table, scrubbing the floor, sweeping the garage, handing Daddy tools, watering the landscape, etc. Most important, is training them to respond to your ‘orders’ immediately. If you tell them to run to the house but they stop to watch what’s going on or worse yet, totally ignore you to run into danger – they tip that asset/liability scale on it’s side. I can not emphasize enough the dire necessity of obedience!
    As for the elderly, well that’s a pretty broad brush. I knew a delightful 95 year old woman who was wheelchair bound that sat at her dining room table day after day during the harvest, podding peas, peeling and slicing vegetables and fruits and packing jars. Her husband would finish the processing whenever us “little neighbor girls” failed to get there first. This wonderful couple had been teenagers during the Great Depression and knew how to do everything on the farm even if they weren’t physically capable of actually performing the task. The older generation also makes great school teachers, my husbands grandmother went to the local grade school and read with second graders until she was 105 years old. She was an amazing asset to the teachers and was able to help youngsters with different learning styles simply because they adored her.
    On the flip side, we had a long term friendship with a couple who were “just like us” until they had children. Our eyes were opened when they came for a week vacation. The kids had not been properly trained and were demanding, whiny and blatantly disobedient. The icing on the cake was when we were told that if they HAD to come here, HE would be in charge. Fortunately for all, they’ve had plenty of time to make new plans.
    I think the key is to watch people with a pragmatic eye. How do they conduct themselves when things are good and how do they respond to the life crisis’s we all face in ‘normal’ times. Surround yourself with rational optimists.

    1. Pam, you are quite right that we shouldn’t all be expected to contribute the same for all sorts of reasons but that doesn’t mean people still can’t contribute. In many ways I would rather survive with an elderly couple than twenty-something know-nothing’s!

  2. CM

    I have two words for you . . .

    Dry run.

    Take the time to have those you expect to be there, and maybe some you don’t expect, and meet – whether at your place or somewhere else – and live as you would expect to for a week or two. Use vacation time if you have to. But, the time to work out group dynamics is before the flag goes up, not after.

    After, everyone will be on edge, cranky, irrational, UN-thinking, and maybe over reactive to the point of destroying property or hurting people before they are brought under control, or as a worst case pushed out the door. You really MUST KNOW who you can trust NOW, not later. Later is too late.

    1. I’ve lived with family (even recently and in fact have my niece living with us) and if I had to live with most of these people under stressful situations, well, I’m not so sure that I could do it! And, if it’s my house everyone’s at, there would be probably be a few less people living there by the end of the week. 😉 Granted, we’ve recently moved some 2000 miles from everyone I know so currently this isn’t much of a problem.

  3. Ranger

    Well written and understood. I teach this concept in my classes. We all look for someone with special skills, but there is more to look at than just that.
    I have worked with doctors in disaster situations and some just can’t function without staff and bright lights and all the equipment they have at their office or hospital.
    I take a PJ, SF Medic, or Vet over some that I have worked with. You multi skilled people to survive the future.
    RangerRick

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *